I build machines that have to work out where they are and what they are looking at — a racing car with no driver, a drone mapping a mine where GPS cannot reach, a camera sorting waste on a moving belt. Most of my useful work has been figuring out why something failed when the obvious explanation was wrong.
Nobody assigned this one. A full autonomous racing stack on Linux: 2D LiDAR SLAM with particle-filter localisation, closed-loop Pure Pursuit tracking, and a reactive gap-finding controller that picks a line through obstacles at speed.
Read the codeTwo sensing modes for finding people: YOLOv5 on the surface, simulated ground-penetrating radar below it. 84.7% detection confidence across 50+ runs. The part worth talking about is not the number — it is knowing which conditions made each sensor lie.
Read the codeUnderground tunnels defeat visual localisation: no ambient light, and brick walls that repeat every few metres so every frame looks like the last. An unscented Kalman filter fusing 100 Hz IMU with sparse visual features and LiDAR cut positional drift 82.4%, down to 0.07 m over a 60 m gallery. I am first author on the paper.
A 500 mm cube carrying 20 kg at 1 m/s, drivetrain sized from first principles to a 2.0 safety factor. 6 mm aluminium base plate, an ABS mezzanine isolating the compute from motor vibration, and a TS35 DIN rail so standard components mount without custom brackets.
Owl-inspired serrations on a UAV propeller, three geometries, transient large-eddy simulation. Full-span serration cut noise 3.87 dB. Serrating only half the blade made it 1.87 dB worse — and the cause was not the serration but the junction between treated and untreated sections. The transition was wrong, not either half.
Read the studyA healthcare analytics product taken from research to working software in a competition sprint. Market and competitor research first, then requirements and wireframes, then a multi-agent pipeline with an NLP layer that turns unstructured reports into ranked KPI dashboards someone non-technical can actually read.
Read the codeShivendu Kumar (first author), Dr. Golak Bihari Mahanta. A hybrid unscented Kalman filter and safe-flight-corridor architecture for tracking miners where satellite positioning does not reach. Funded by the TEXMiN Chanakya Undergraduate Fellowship.
Shivendu Kumar, Dr. Bhivraj Suthar. A unified perception, planning and control architecture in Webots for autonomous victim detection. I contributed the data analysis and the quantitative evaluation of detection performance.
TEXMiN Foundation, IIT (ISM) Dhanbad. One of a small number of undergraduates nationally funded to define and run an independent research project.
For a data-backed technical strategy on antimicrobial resistance, argued before an international panel.
Led technical contributions and coordinated hardware integration and sensor validation through to the national elimination round.
Among the top teams nationwide from more than 115,000 registrations.
Marine plastic pollution challenge, among 150+ international participants.
NIT Patna. Previously on the content team. Also Event and PR Lead at ISIE NITP SRA, sponsorship lead for ByteVerse, and organiser of the Smart India Hackathon presentation round.
From more than 110,000 applicants. Also top five at Material Spark 2025, IIT Patna.